Five conversations between topics that should be talking to each other. Thicker arcs are more critical. The pulsing arc with the crawling dash is the biggest gap: AGDF is not among the cancer-prevention, HPV-vaccination, or health-equity funders, where its hold on the screening workforce is unmatched. Hover any arc to read what would close that gap.
Hover an arc or a card · Click to pin · Thicker arc = more critical
?How to read this
Each dashed arc is a conversation that is not happening between two topics that should connect. Thicker arcs are more critical (severity 9 at the top of the scale). The bright dot at the middle of each arc is the bridge: what would close the gap. The focal arc with the crawling dash is AGDF being absent from three funder categories entirely.
a conversation that isn't happening what would close it (hover)thicker arc = more critical
Five conversations the foundation isn't having. Two are critical. All five come down to one thing: AGDF has the dentists, but has never described them in the language funders pay for. The focal arc with the crawling dash is AGDF being absent from three funder categories entirely: cancer prevention, HPV vaccination, and health equity. It is not competing with other dental foundations at all. The second severity-9 arc connects the dental-foundation funder pool to five non-dental funder pools where AGDF's hold on the screening workforce is unmatched. The three smaller arcs show what follows: the oral-cancer conversation is happening without AGDF, the 40,000 dentists are treated as a contact list, and the credibility signals a non-dental funder checks are missing or stale.