ShurIQ Editorial ← Editorial
Intelligence Suite · AGDF v0.4

The Visualization Suite

Five views into the public conversation about dental philanthropy and oral cancer prevention donors: Network Explorer, Gap Radar, Structural Advantage, Negative Space, and Composite Dashboard. Each shows a different angle on the same problem: in the public conversation, attention flows past AGDF. 40,000 member dentists; 61 Instagram followers.

7Topics in the conversation
5Structural gaps
45.0SAS Composite
8Sources
60,480Oral cancer cases / year
Viewport 01
Network Explorer
A map of the public conversation about dental philanthropy and oral cancer prevention. Foundation and cancer are the words this conversation turns toward. AGDF stays at the edge of it, and attention flows past the foundation.
Topics 7 Top words Foundation / Cancer
Launch viewport
Viewport 02
Gap Radar
Five conversations the foundation isn’t having, rendered as arcs. Two are critical. All five come down to one thing: AGDF has the dentists but has never described them in language funders pay for. The pulsing arc is the biggest gap.
Gaps 5 Critical 2 Focal Funders × Patients Sev max 9
Launch viewport
Viewport 03
Structural Advantage
Five-dimension scorecard at equal 20% weight. Composite 45.0/100. The dashed crimson edge between Cause-Frame Multiplicity and Donor Pipeline Diversity are its two weakest scores: AGDF speaks one language (dental), so it draws from one set of funders. One editorial decision lifts both.
Composite 45.0/100 Dimensions 5 Lowest Pipeline 40.0 Weakest Frame × Pipeline
Launch viewport
Viewport 04
Negative Space
Cancer Prevention. HPV Vaccination. Health Equity. Project 200 Mouths. The four funder categories the workforce qualifies for, and the campaign that gets members posting, rendered as phantom outlines. The present graph is muted cobalt; the absences pulse in magenta.
Phantoms 4 Credentials 2 Funders Cancer / HPV / Equity / 200 Mouths Source Repositioning
Launch viewport
Viewport 05
Composite Dashboard
All four upstream viewports compressed into a single bento. 8 numbers run along the bottom, each one a public source behind a claim. SAS 45.0, the two weakest scores labeled, the four funder categories AGDF is silent in.
Viewports 5 SAS 45.0 Sources 8 Bento tiles 6
Launch viewport